Home
/
Compare
/
Cavuno vs Jboard

Cavuno vs Jboard

 CavunoJboard
ModelAI-aggregation-led white-label board that runs itself, at a low entry priceBuilder-style white-label board with AI backfill and a built-in ATS, built for revenue-focused operators
Where roles come fromAI job aggregation from millions of listings, with automated taggingAI job backfill importing daily from 200,000+ career sites, quota-gated per plan (300 / 1,000 / 2,500 backfilled jobs per month)
PricingStarter $29 / Basic $139 / Grow $239 / Advanced $439 per month. Enterprise not publishedStandard $249 / Advanced $449 / Scale $849 per month, about 20% less billed annually. Enterprise not published
Free trialStart free with no credit card and pay when ready to launch. No stated day length14-day free trial
MonetisationNot published on the pricing page. No Cavuno transaction fee on standard plans (Stripe processing fees apply)Monetisation tools for employer postings. Keep 100% of your revenue per the pricing page
Admin seats1 on Starter, 25 on Advanced. Other tiers not published2 (Standard), 6 (Advanced), 10 (Scale)
Access modelsPublic. Private and invite-only not publishedPublic. Private and invite-only not published
MatchingAI semantic searchNot published

Verdict

Cavuno and Jboard are both white-label boards that fill themselves automatically, so the choice is about entry point and depth. Cavuno leads with a low published entry at $29 per month, AI aggregation from millions of listings and a no-code builder pitched as running itself. Jboard leads with revenue-focused depth, with monetisation tools for employer postings, daily AI backfill from 200,000+ career sites and a built-in ATS on its top plan. Pick by whether a light-touch self-running board or deeper operator tooling matters more to your board.

Pricing in detail

Cavuno publishes five tiers in USD. Starter is $29 per month with AI job aggregation, the no-code white-label builder, 300 active jobs, 1 team seat and 1,000 subscribers. Basic is $139 per month and Grow is $239 per month, each adding higher limits per the pricing page, with Grow the recommended tier. Advanced is $439 per month with 15,000 active jobs, 25 team seats, 100,000 subscribers and removal of the powered-by footer. Enterprise pricing is not published (custom, billed annually). There are no setup fees and no Cavuno transaction fee, though Stripe processing fees apply. You can start free with no credit card and pay when ready to launch.

Jboard publishes its plans in USD. Standard is $249 per month with the white-label builder, AI job backfill and monetisation tools. Advanced is $449 per month and adds further tooling per the pricing page. Scale is $849 per month and adds a built-in ATS on the top plan. Enterprise pricing is not published (custom, above Scale). Annual billing is about 20% less, at $199 / $359 / $679 per month. Jboard lists a 14-day free trial, no setup fees on any plan and you keep 100% of your revenue per the pricing page. Backfill quotas run 300 / 1,000 / 2,500 jobs per month by plan. The two meter differently, Cavuno by active jobs, seats and subscribers while Jboard meters by backfill quota, seats and ATS access.

Where Cavuno fits

Cavuno is built for founders and growing organisations that want to launch an aggregation-led white-label job board at a low entry price and let AI keep it filled and tagged. AI aggregation pulls from millions of listings. Automated tagging keeps roles filterable while AI semantic search helps visitors find them. The no-code builder means no development work. There are no setup fees and no Cavuno transaction fee on standard plans, though Stripe processing fees apply. Entry at $29 per month with a start-free path suits operators comfortable with self-serve. If a self-serve board that runs itself from a low entry price is the goal, Cavuno is built for that.

Where Jboard fits

Jboard is built for revenue-focused board operators - niche communities, associations, publishers and recruitment agencies, used in 38+ countries - who want builder-style control of a white-label board. Its drag-and-drop builder gives operators direct control. Daily AI backfill from 200,000+ career sites keeps the board full, quota-gated at 300 / 1,000 / 2,500 jobs per month by plan. Monetisation tooling supports employer postings and you keep 100% of your revenue per the pricing page. A built-in ATS on the top tier keeps applicant tracking in one place. If builder control with monetisation tooling and an ATS on top matters most, Jboard is built for that.

A third model - community-first placement

There is a third model for boards that exist to serve a defined community rather than to be operated or monetised. Spacewalk sources an employer-direct verified job stream, matches it to your community with smart talent matching and reports through to placements, with no revenue share on any employer fees. It suits organisations that already have the people. See Spacewalk vs Cavuno and Spacewalk vs Jboard or view pricing.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Cavuno and Jboard?

Both are white-label boards filled automatically, but they lead with different depths. Cavuno leads with a low published entry at $29 per month, AI aggregation from millions of listings, automated tagging and AI semantic search. Jboard leads with revenue-focused tooling, with a drag-and-drop builder, daily AI backfill from 200,000+ career sites, monetisation tools and a built-in ATS on its top plan.

Where do the jobs come from on each board?

Cavuno uses AI job aggregation from millions of listings with automated tagging. A refresh cadence is not published. Jboard uses AI job backfill importing daily from 200,000+ career sites, quota-gated at 300 / 1,000 / 2,500 backfilled jobs per month by plan.

Which is cheaper, Cavuno or Jboard?

Published entry sits lower on Cavuno at $29 per month, with tiers at $139 / $239 / $439 and a custom Enterprise tier. Jboard runs $249 / $449 / $849 per month, about 20% less billed annually, with a custom Enterprise tier above Scale. Compare at the job volumes and seat counts you would actually run, since the two gate their tiers differently.

Which includes an applicant tracking system?

Jboard includes a built-in ATS on its top Scale plan, keeping applicant tracking inside the board. Cavuno does not publish ATS support on its pricing page. Cavuno's published depth sits in filling the board, with AI aggregation, automated tagging and AI semantic search.

Is there a third option?

Yes. If your board exists to serve a defined community rather than to be operated or monetised, Spacewalk offers a community-first placement model with an employer-direct verified job stream matched to your community, placement reporting and no revenue share. See the Spacewalk comparisons or the pricing page.